This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

When Oculus announced its Kickstarter entrada for the Rift VR headset, it probably didn't realize just how excited consumers were going to be. The number of companies planning to launch VR headsets or related technologies has skyrocketed in recent years. Sony has VR plans for the PlayStation 4, Qualcomm claims VR capabilities are baked into its upcoming Snapdragon 820, and both AMD and Nvidia are planning marketing blitzes of their ain. It's surprising — and honestly, refreshing — to see a major analyst house putting the brakes on expectations for the market, and projecting that VR faces a slow, steady build over the adjacent 4 years rather than meteoric success.

Gear VR

Samsung's Gear VR is coming at $99

IHS is projecting initial VR hardware sales at $1.1 billion in 2016, growing to 2.vii billion in 2020. The firm expects smartphone-compatible headsets to account to 64% of the full install base, likely thanks to the drastic cost divergence betwixt the Oculus Rift and the upcoming $99 Gear VR. IHS notes that near spending on software will take place at the loftier-terminate of the market, which is expected to split between the Oculus Rift, PlayStation VR, and HTC Vive. Total game-related VR sales for 2016 are expected to be $496 million.

"Conditions are more suited to virtual reality technology and content adoption than ever earlier," IHS supply wrote, "It is neither a chimera nor the next large thing."

Tiresome and steady wins the race

I've been impressed by VR applied science every time I've had a chance to use information technology, which is why I'm glad to run across an annotator business firm issuing a realistic analysis of the technology'south nigh-term potential. As great as VR is, designing VR games requires developers to consider aspects of how the brain processes move, movement, and the location of your body. This sense is called proprioception, and wearing a headset can interfere with it dramatically. This piece from Ars Technica reviewed some of the challenges when designing environments for VR. Certain kinds of move are prone to triggering nausea in players. Stairs, for example, tin can be troublesome — when your brain sees "you" climbing stairs, it instinctively attempts to position you for doing then. Players end up leaning backwards to counteract nonexistent forces.

Some of these issues may be easy to fix; researchers accept reported that only adding a nose to VR outset person games helps stabilize the view and reduce nausea. Either way, developers are going to have to alter the kinds of content they develop for VR. And that's a potential trouble.

It helps to consider the fate of three-D movie house and that engineering science's sudden surge and waning strength. The early on 3-D films that dominated the mod era — Polar Express and Avatar — were created specifically in that format and were designed to take advantage of it. Once studios realized that iii-D content was selling, they jumped to have advantage of it — by and large past pushing inferior, post-production 2d conversions, or by including only a limited amount of three-D moving picture (15-20 minutes of the movie). These efforts are often distinctly inferior, and the colour palettes tend to be muted and muddy every bit a result. Slap on a $five-$ten surcharge for 3-D tickets, and consumers chop-chop realized that while they were paying a premium for a 3-D film, they oftentimes weren't receiving an improved feel.

three-D and VR are very dissimilar technologies, but they both require content creators to design towards the specific capabilities of their respective platforms, while acknowledging and compensating for their differences. A huge flush of VR content might seem like a gaming all-time-example scenario, but I strongly suspect that many corporations would abandon principles of expert design in their rush to pile on and brand a quick cadet.

The downside to this tendency is that it could take several years for the market to truly grab on, and funding for AAA titles in VR conversions could be few and far between. Studios will likely commencement experimenting with content near immediately, and there are some amazing games in development, but we don't expect VR to boss game sales out of the gate. It'll be another four-v years (and probably some other generation of console hardware) before nosotros beginning to encounter the medium find its legs. Simply as far as getting things right and building a stable base for the concept, that's the right way to do it.